Showing posts with label alternative living. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alternative living. Show all posts

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Humanity Thirsts for Experience

            The meaning of life is experience. How sad and pathetic that so many come to inhabit this world, seeking the answer, and fall away unsatisfied. Worse, those who nobly die with the righteous belief that their purpose for existence was subservience and devotion to a deity. It would shatter their very beings to open their minds and see that God is the greatest lie ever told. So instead they live, day after day consuming purpose via obtuse old rituals written by power-hungry, delusional men. Even the few who break free of the traditional paradigms still may fall into lesser belief structures, such as Paganism, adopting ritual and worship again for the comfort and sense of purpose they provide.
            But true purpose comes from humanity alone. We have evolved from the primordial soup, risen above the base masses of primitive animals, to achieve the ultimate success of intellect, of self-awareness. Of individuality.
            So, where do we go from here? Oddly, we fight against our own progress, and have done so since day one. We develop order and patriotism, laws and structure, then cleave to them as the monkeys we left behind still cling to the absurd comfort, safety, and familiarity of the trees we came down from. The very nature of humanity is change, is daring to take the ultimate, terrifying leap into the unknown. It was once fueled by curiosity, but that human urge has been placated at last by over-saturation. Why bother to be curious now, when all that is knowable (or truly worth knowing, considering our limited scope of the universe) is already known?
            That, however, is a fatal fallacy. We have focused on facts rather than experience, emotions, and empathy. A world at peace, a love without jealousy, a humanity graced with universal acceptance . . . these experiences are real, they are possible, but they are, to this day, mere dreams—as the notion of a man walking on the moon may once have seemed to Copernicus. Should we not, least, abate our hunger for facts, having fully supped, and indulge a while in our thirst for experience? It’s not that we’ll never be hungry again, nor thirsty forever, but humanity itself is a single organism working in unison, as our cells and organs compose us, and like all organisms, its needs—so far as sustenance is concerned—are varied.
            We’ll never come to truly understand how the universe operates until we first experience why it matters at all that we know. After all, we did not discover the horrible wonders of the split atom until we experienced a need for that understanding. But can’t wisdom come from positive, progressive needs, rather than superficial ones—protection, domination, self-preservation in the face of an enemy—and thereby carry with it a mark of pride and accomplishment hitherto unknown to the human race?
            In short, if we may submit ourselves to love and benevolence, rather than fear and hatred, can we not better unlock human potential, solely through the experience of the most beautiful aspects of our shared humanity?

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Understanding Polyamory




            Polyamory is the practice of simultaneously engaging in multiple meaningful, committed, loving relationships. It is a rational, beautiful alternative to the traditional monogamous relationship paradigm that has dominated the western world for centuries, and it is distinct from polygamy, open relationships, and swingers. Polyamory is a lifestyle, even a sexual preference, and it is the next movement in the sexual and relationship revolution currently taking place. I am polyamorous, and I would like to take some time to explain what exactly that means—and what it does not mean.
            To start, you have to understand the causes that led me to a polyamorous mindset. I do not consider it something I’ve chosen to live, but simply the route I have been supposed to take all along. Although there have been hurdles along the way, the same would be true of a monogamous relationship, so I don’t consider the difficulties I’ve encountered particularly salient detractions. Simply put, I look around me and see so much anger, jealousy, and negativity in the world. After a war that has dragged on for over a decade and a society that has come to take the word “terrorism” as a fact of life, I have wondered if an alternative exists. One does.
            Since polyamory is the act of loving multiple people, it stands to reason, then, that it is also the act of cultivating more love and positive energy in this increasingly hostile world. For that reason alone, it is worth considering.
            But more powerful is the knowledge that love is far from a finite resource. It is an emotion, a feeling, like so many others. It would be absurd to tell someone not to get “too happy” or “too sad”; these emotions, like all others, come in varying intensities and are instigated by various things. Indeed, the more things we have in our lives that make us happy, the happier we are. The same works for love. The more people we have in our lives whom we love, the more love we have to give and the more loved we feel. It’s really that simple.
            If you have ever found yourself wishing to connect with a friend at a more intimate level—be it holding hands, a hug, a kiss, or even sexually—then you probably have already felt what I’m describing. If you’ve ever had that feeling while already in a loving, committed relationship—without thereby lessening the already existing feelings toward your lover—then you have definitely felt what I’m describing. Take a moment now to think about that feeling.
            In a polyamorous relationship, these feelings are encouraged because the returns are great. Do jealousy and insecurity pop up? Initially, yes. But once we learn to acknowledge and then disregard these negative feelings, recognizing their petty, self-centered nature, we are able to break free of the yoke of social restraint and begin to develop something bigger
            As I already said, polyamory is distinct from polygamy, open relationships, and swingers. Polygamy is a typically religion-based practice of multiple spouses—often, one husband with multiple wives. Polyamorists typically are very hostile and skeptical of religion and marriage both, and they are certainly interested in having a level playing field rather than a male-dominated one. So polygamy and polyamory are clearly very distinct. Open relationships involve a committed couple allowing one another to engage in sex with other partners (often as a result of being geographically distant). Open relationships do not seek additional loving partners, but merely the gratification of sexual desires. And swingers are similar. Swingers are couples who swap partners or even engage in sexual acts all together, but they do not form loving, committed relationships. As soon as additional loving relationships are added to the open relationship or swinger format, it has actually evolved into polyamory.
            Sex, it would seem, is not a part of the polyamorous lifestyle, then. But to think that would be a huge misunderstanding. Of course sex is a part of the lifestyle! It is simply not the focus. However, most polyamorous people have healthy, open attitudes toward sexuality, are comfortable discussing it, and they do choose partners based in part on sexual attraction. Sex is a part of life, and we accept and embrace that rather than shun it. But it cannot be the motivating factor behind relationships in order for them to last.
            As an additional result of the polyamorous mindset, bisexuality is extremely common. Once a commitment to love more people has been made, it is a natural step to tear down any arbitrary gender-based boundaries, thus in effect doubling the number of prospective lovers.
            These points undoubtedly raise questions in the open-minded reader and skeptic alike. The most common: How many partners is enough? Similarly, how does one find enough time for all those partners? The answers to those questions are highly specific to individual needs, time, and polyamorous motivations. Polyamorous communes do in fact exist, harboring groups into the double-digits of people all living together and loving each other. But these scenarios are rare. More common are relationships based around three to five members, their relationships sometimes intertwining but sometimes kept separate. Imagine a web of relationships. Regarding the issue of time, that depends on proximity, levels of connection, and individual needs. But when you have multiple people fulfilling different relationship roles for the same person (as well as that person fulfilling different relationship roles for other people), then you are likely to find an economy of love that simply works its way out in the end—just as some traditionally monogamous couples are together constantly, and others spend lots of time apart. Both are functional, healthy relationship styles.
            A final question is, what about the children? Well, since homosexual couples have had to field responses to that same inane objection for decades now when trying to start their own families, it makes sense that polyamorous people have to do the same. The answer is simple; when children are involved, how can it ever be a bad thing to have those children surrounded by more people to love and influence them? If anything, they grow up with much healthier ideologies about love and sexuality and are overall happier people.
            To conclude, I am not trying to persuade anyone to my lifestyle. Anyone who knows me well and has heard me talk about these issues knows that my sole goal is to raise awareness and, with any luck, reveal to a few like-minded people that there is an alternative out there. I’ve done it many times already, so I hope this article continues with that success.
            Peace and love!

Suggestions for further reading:

http://www.planetwaves.net/compersion.html - article discussing the feeling of pleasure polyamorous people feel knowing that their partner receives pleasure being with another partner.

http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/ - a cool polyamorous blog that offers an unapologetic look into the lifestyle.

http://aphroweb.net/nre_faq.htm - discusses “new relationship energy”—the impact on an already existing relationship exacted by falling in love with another person openly.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/07/28/only-you-and-you-and-you.html - discusses both the social rise of polyamory and the many challenges it faces in gaining acceptance.

http://lovingmorenonprofit.org/faq.php - a famous polyamorous online magazine.